ChuukVotes.org Chuuk State unofficial results
2027 General Election
Flag of Chuuk State2026 Chuuk State Election Results
Unofficial — not certified
Last publishedMay 13, 2026, 10:26 PM ChST

Fefan 1 seat

Mayor - Fefan

1,701 candidate votes
11 of 18 reporting61%
Current standingRanked by total votes · Provisional
  1. 1Keim Mathias & Tamson SimiLeading95456.1%
  2. 2Wis Werner & William Romos74743.9%
Leading margin: 207 votes. Keim Mathias & Tamson Simi leads Wis Werner & William Romos. Jump to voting places
Jump to places

Area ledger

Results by voting place

11 of 18 places shown
Places shown
Candidates in listed order
Leading hereTie for firstHighlights are provisional.

Scroll within the table to compare all places. Candidate headings and place names stay visible. Expand for more room.

Printed view: All municipalities · Reporting only. 11 places shown. Percentages are shares of candidate votes.

Candidate votes by municipality and voting place. All municipalities · Reporting only. Candidates are in listed order.
Municipality / voting placeWis Werner & William RomosVotes / shareKeim Mathias & Tamson SimiVotes / shareTotal
Fefan11 of 18 reporting · 11 shown
Inaka152 candidate votes7549.3%7750.7%Leading here152
Fanip Kukku209 candidate votes5827.8%15172.2%Leading here209
Soporenong199 candidate votes6130.7%13869.3%Leading here199
Messa175 candidate votes16795.4%Leading here84.6%175
Pwene156 candidate votes8554.5%Leading here7145.5%156
Sapore234 candidate votes12653.8%Leading here10846.2%234
UFO249 candidate votes7329.3%17670.7%Leading here249
Fefan VAAPP Weno12 candidate votes216.7%1083.3%Leading here12
Fefan VAAPP Honolulu143 candidate votes3927.3%10472.7%Leading here143
Fefan VAAPP Guam163 candidate votes5533.7%10866.3%Leading here163
Fefan VAAPP Travelers9 candidate votes666.7%Leading here333.3%9
Fefan subtotal11 displayed places74743.9%95456.1%Leading here1,701

Fefan

11 of 18 reporting · 11 shown

1,701 votes shown

Inaka

152 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Wis Werner & William Romos7549.3%
  2. Keim Mathias & Tamson SimiLeading here7750.7%

Fanip Kukku

209 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Wis Werner & William Romos5827.8%
  2. Keim Mathias & Tamson SimiLeading here15172.2%

Soporenong

199 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Wis Werner & William Romos6130.7%
  2. Keim Mathias & Tamson SimiLeading here13869.3%

Messa

175 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Wis Werner & William RomosLeading here16795.4%
  2. Keim Mathias & Tamson Simi84.6%

Pwene

156 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Wis Werner & William RomosLeading here8554.5%
  2. Keim Mathias & Tamson Simi7145.5%

Sapore

234 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Wis Werner & William RomosLeading here12653.8%
  2. Keim Mathias & Tamson Simi10846.2%

UFO

249 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Wis Werner & William Romos7329.3%
  2. Keim Mathias & Tamson SimiLeading here17670.7%

Fefan VAAPP Weno

12 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Wis Werner & William Romos216.7%
  2. Keim Mathias & Tamson SimiLeading here1083.3%

Fefan VAAPP Honolulu

143 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Wis Werner & William Romos3927.3%
  2. Keim Mathias & Tamson SimiLeading here10472.7%

Fefan VAAPP Guam

163 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Wis Werner & William Romos5533.7%
  2. Keim Mathias & Tamson SimiLeading here10866.3%

Fefan VAAPP Travelers

9 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Wis Werner & William RomosLeading here666.7%
  2. Keim Mathias & Tamson Simi333.3%

Fefan subtotal

1,701 candidate votes

Leading here
  1. Wis Werner & William Romos74743.9%
  2. Keim Mathias & Tamson SimiLeading here95456.1%

Latest returns

Showing 3 of 8 latest reportsView all updates →
Fefan — Inaka

0152 votes now shown

Fefan — Fefan VAAPP Honolulu

+143143 votes now shown

Fefan — Fefan VAAPP Guam

+163163 votes now shown

How these results are calculated

Totals sum published voting-place returns. Percentages are shares of all candidate votes, not shares of voters; voters may choose more than one candidate in a multi-seat race. Reporting progress counts a place after its first published return, including a zero-vote return. Municipality subtotals sum the displayed places; active search filters are clearly marked. Green means the current leading or seat-range candidates; amber marks only a tie at the final-seat boundary. A tie within the seat range is not a cutoff tie. Area standings do not declare a winner unless the race is certified.

Full methodology and flag credits →